The chastity clothing line that creates victims

The Anti-Rape wear clothing line will only encourage victim blaming and fails to deal with the root of the problem- the rapist

In 19 days (at the time of writing) AR wear (an Anti-Rape clothing company) plans on having raised $50000 in funds to kick start their clothing line. The range will consist of women’s underwear and running shorts, with plans to branch out into travel shorts. All of the items are designed to apparently allow their wearers to feel safer and empowered when they go out.

The idea is that a woman will put on the garment, adjust the sizing and seal the lock, thus leaving her in a kind of reinforced chastity belt which cannot be pulled down or adjusted at the waist or thigh. The items each have a central panel on the thigh, waistband and edging of the leg holes made of “specially designed, cut resistant straps and webbing” as demonstrated with industrial style scissors in the Vimeo video. As they claim on their fundraising page, the items will “allow women and girls to passively resist an attacker”.

However, I believe the product will perpetuate rather than diminish rape-culture by allowing for an increase of victim blaming. Now if a girl is raped it will not just be ‘but you were drunk’, ‘you didn’t explicitly say no’ but also ‘why were you not wearing anti-rape wear? You must have not minded being raped’. Indeed the entire video seems to say; ‘OK Girls, we give in, you can wear your short dress out, you can even go out when it’s dark- but only if you wear a padlock over your vagina’.

This puts the blame on the female rape victim. It doesn’t try to solve the issue of men thinking it’s acceptable to force themselves on a woman. Its message is wrapping the women up, making them responsible for the mindless objectifying as a better alternative to dealing with the root of the problem.

There are other issues with the video advertising the products. It’s racist for one. The models are predominantly white or paler females of colour, and as the video narration says they’re in “potentially risky situations” we see a group of pale skinned females walk past a homeless black man, thus reinforcing the outrageous stereotype that all rape victims are white cis-women, and all rapists black cis-men.

Furthermore it does nothing to address that the findings of studies that show percentages of rape by a stranger is 4 per cent, whereas it is 46 per cent of the incidents are committed by “someone you love”. These findings are not isolated, similar figures are frequently quoted in the media. Women cannot wear these chastity belts all the time. The advertising perpetuates the false perception of rapists solely being strangers, being someone who jumps out in the middle of the night. Yet this will not protect them from the majority of situations where a rape could occur.

What is meant to happen after the rapist realises he can’t get the AR wear off anyway? He is hardly likely to just walk off find another; that’s not how rapist phycology works. Indeed the AR clothing may just cause a more dangerous situation as the attacker becomes more aggressive through their frustration.

Women (and men) should never be blamed for sexual abuse they suffer. Ultimately the issue is not what women choose to wear, when they choose to travel, if they have had a drink on the night out. The issue is the rapist. They are who we should condemn, who should be taught how to respect women, who should be locking their genitals into anti-rape wear.


  1. 5 Nov ’13 at 6:18 pm

    Andrew Knowles

    “It doesn’t try to solve the issue of men thinking it’s acceptable to force themselves on a woman.”
    Isn’t that like trying to argue that stab-proof vests don’t solve the “issue of men thinking it’s acceptable to stab another person.”? Rape doesn’t happen because people don’t know that forcing sex on some one else isn’t right or legal- it happens because some people have mental health issues, or have been brought up in awful circumstances, or are just really horrible (or a combination of the three).
    Rape, or stabbings or shootings for that matter, surely does not come from an endemic ‘culture of acceptability’, it comes from a complex interplay of reasons that I’ve stated, and probably more. The few arguments for its existence don’t hold any ground for me at all- usually that “a friend of a friend heard a guy make a rape joke, rape culture ahhh!”, or something along those lines.
    Incidentally, I do agree that this new item is a stupid idea- although mainly with the suggestion that a rapist might become frustrated when realising the victim is wearing it, and so might go on to do something worse.


  2. Frankly this is insulting for men. Are we thereby assuming that women need to wear these garments because all men are rapists?


  3. Stating that “it happens because some people have mental health issues”, no matter what the follow up statement, is surely doing more of a disservice to Andrew Knowle’s argument than justifying it? Trying to say reasons behind rape are more complicated, and then offering simple, incredibly unsatisfactory and offensive explanations for a rapist’s actions seems a bit…dare I say it… hypocritical? Saying ‘it’s more complicated than that’ and then use sweeping discriminatory generalizations to justify yourself? Hmm…