York Union: Are young people to blame for their disengagement in Westminster politics?

gives us an account of the York Union’s first debate of the year concerning student apathy

Photo Credit: Petroc Taylor

Photo Credit: Petroc Taylor

The first York Union debate of the 2014/15 academic year considered the issue of youth apathy, and whether young people themselves are to blame for their disengagement with Westminster politics. While the event was a generally friendly affair, the audience was nonetheless subjected to impassioned arguments from both sides of the panel.
Indeed, Business Editor of the Spectator, Martin Vander Weyer was joined by the equally charismatic Stephen Bush in favour of the motion. Stephen is the driving force behind the Telegraph’s Morning Briefing.

In opposition was Chloe Smith, MP for Norwich North and University of York alumna. Accompanying her was Will Brett, Head of Media for the Electoral Reform Society and former political researcher.

Martin Vander Weyer kick-started the debate by attacking the victim culture prevalent within the current British electorate. Those who remain inactive as a consequence of insufficient political knowledge or a lack of interest cannot blame anyone else but themselves. He left the audience with the enticing last few words: “It’s in your hands, get engaged”.

Chloe Smith responded by stating that youth apathy is not a matter of blame, but an issue that both people and politicians must come together to address. She provided reasons for youth disengagement, citing distrust of politicians, lack of interest and not feeling listened to. She finished by urging young people to vote in order to break a vicious cycle that has led to young people being ignored and further alienated from our political system.

Stephen Bush took to the stage by offering a stanch defence of democracy and the value of our vote. He criticised the claim that all parties are the same, and stated that if we don’t take control over who govern us then things will never improve.

Finally, Will Brett expressed his disapproval of the notion that young people are naïve, unable to understand the difficult and multifaceted nature of modern politics. Asserting that our political system has failed young people, he posited that reforms to this system must be at the heart of voter reengagement.

The panel then fielded questions from the York Union audience on topics such as lowering of the voting age, pensioner favouritism and compulsory voting.

In the end, it was the proposition that was able to command the largest swing of voters on the night. It seemed that not everyone could be convinced however, as one abstaining voter provided a moment of comedy as he boisterously proclaimed “I’m a Libertarian”. Nonetheless, the debate was thought-provoking and good spirited, giving the audience a taster of what the York Union has in store this academic year.

One comment

  1. This is stupid. Lets host a debate about young people to young people (how engaging..). This is such a non- debate, perhaps the issue is the bullshit we call Westminster politics, the fact that all parties lie through their teeth and are all trying to play centre left/right/up/down politics. We live in a world of career politicians, or at best politicians that go into politics with the aim of improving society but are held back by red tape or corrupted by power, their peers and the lucrative opportunities their privileges provide. So are young people to blame for disengagement in politics? No. Politicians are. Our country goes to war, yet its citizens disapprove, we are spied on by our governments, the media are told not to report on it, our politicians make promises, they don’t for-fill them. This is politics. This is the cause of disengagement.

    Blaming the voter or more specifically young people is just a waste of everyone’s time. Of course this isn’t the issue. Debates like this distract from the real issues.

    Reply Report

Leave a comment

Please note our disclaimer relating to comments submitted. Please do not post pretending to be another person. Nouse is not responsible for user-submitted content.