Should Premier League managers be allowed in the dugout?

After Alan Pardew’s now infamous head-butt on David Meyler, assesses what could be done to prevent touchline incidents from occurring in the future

Image: Alan Head

Image: Alan Head

A few weeks ago Alan Pardew once again made headlines for his antics on the touchline, this time, for a more serious offense.; the Newcastle United manager head-butted Hull City player David Meyler just outside of his technical area. Pardew was subsequently punished by the FA, receiving a £60,000 fine, a three match stadium ban and a four match touchline ban in addition to the £100,000 fine that his club imposed on him.

Pardew’s behaviour has led some to call for a complete ban of managers in the dugout. At first, this might seem like an extreme reaction, but let’s first consider the pros and cons of allowing the managers to stay in the dugout. Firstly, the manager is in the dugout in order to instruct his players and to motivate his players. This is a fundamental part of management; the man-management of players during match day, something that is often based in the dugout and which requires managers to therefore stay on the touchline.

The cons? Well, as previously mentioned there is the potential manager-player confrontation – let’s not forget Tim Sherwood hurtling the ball at Bacary Sagna as his Tottenham side faced Arsenal the other week. Furthermore, managers can be abusive towards fourth officials; once again Pardew is guilty of ill-discipline here as in August 2012 he pushed over a fourth official. Sir Alex Ferguson was also guilty of confronting fourth officials during his time on the touchline.

In addition to this, you’ve got potential manager-manager confrontation. Once more, serial offender Pardew is guilty of this, verbally abusing Manuel Pellegrini in January when their sides met. Ferguson and Roberto Mancini were also guilty of this, getting into a heated confrontation in April 2012 during the Manchester Derby when Ferguson accused Mancini of harassing the fourth official.

So what is the alternative? Clearly the most obvious solution to any potential problems on the touchline would be to make the managers watch the game from a specially designated area in the stands, in a similar manner that you will have seen during the recent Six Nations tournament.

The advantages of this system would prevent any touchline dramatics from taking place. It would prevent any potential conflicts arising between managers and officials, players or other managers during the game. However, it would prevent the manager from making immediate tactical changes or directly communicating with his players, and both are vital roles for the manager to play when in the dugout. His only real influence on the game would be reduced to making substitutions from the stand.

So what is the solution? Well, there isn’t a dead cert one and I don’t want this to be blown out of proportion. These questions have only arisen due to the actions of a minority of the Premier League’s managers. However, I do have a suggestion that could potentially reduce the amount of drama on the touchline.

My suggestion would be to decrease the size of the technical area. Currently the technical area extends to one metre in front of the dugout. I would halve this distance to increase the gap between the touchline and the edge of the technical area. This would prevent managers from hanging about on the touchline and would see them placed nearer to their dugout.

This would hopefully prevent incidents such as the Pardew head-butt. However, in addition the rules need to be made clearer. I would introduce strict rules preventing managers from having any physical impact on the game. This means that they wouldn’t be allowed to touch the ball or make any physical contact with opposing players during game time. If the ball went into the manager’s technical area or dugout then the manager would be authorised to give the ball to the fourth official first, not any player.

I would also want to see fourth officials be given more power to deal with disruptive managers. If a manager broke the rules then they would first be issued with a verbal warning from the fourth official. Any further offence would mean that the fourth official would have the power to send the manager back to the dressing room for the remainder of the game and the manager would subsequently receive a three match touchline ban. This way, any off field antics would have limited impact on the game and would mean that the referee on the pitch wouldn’t have to deal with unruly managers on the touchline.

I think these changes would certainly limit the amount of touchline drama during a match. Alternatively, we could all learn to get along and not head-butt one another.


  1. Typical for the barcodes to spoil it for everyone else, especially Alan Pardew, the lipless disease-ridden francophilic twat.

    Reply Report

  2. 3 Apr ’14 at 11:11 am

    The Rafa Benitez Appreciation Society

    Firstly, a point of fact, Pardew has never “pushed over a forth official.” He did push a forth official in the back once but I don’t think it was as serious as you are suggesting (see Secondly, “Pardew’s behaviour has led some to call for a complete ban of managers in the dugout.” Who, other than your self, has suggested this? Has anybody at all who is respected in the game suggested this?

    I think you’re trying to find an issue where there simply isn’t one. Managers being available to use the technical area is a crucial part of the game. If a manager displays unacceptable conduct then the referee has the power to send them off. So while you would like “to see fourth officials be given more power to deal with disruptive managers” this is entirely unnecessary as the rules you suggest are clearly already in place and used by referees all the time (see above incident).

    Reply Report

  3. 3 Apr ’14 at 4:04 pm

    Rafa Benitez... You Are Clueless

    Chill out mate, firstly you should actually READ the article in the first place. He’s acknowledging that the technical area is a crucial part of the game (see paragraph 2). Secondly, he’s not trying to find an issue (see paragraph 5) “not trying to blow this out of proportion.” However, for what it is worth I think manager’s behaving badly on the touchline is an issue because it sets a bad example in a sport watched by millions.

    I think the suggestion here is that the rules should be made clearer or enforced more often to stop managers acting like fools on the touchline.

    Also learn to spell “fourth” correctly. Spelling it as “forth” once is bad enough. Twice is just horrendous. It is embarrassing enough that you nit-picked this article, at least spell correctly. Please.

    Reply Report

  4. Hi guys, let me clear up a few issues here.

    First of all, yes, “pushed over” probably wasn’t the best term to use to describe Pardew’s contact with the fourth official. Secondly, I’m not suggesting that we should ban managers from the touchline indefinitely, as you can see I briefly touched on the idea and then decided that it probably wasn’t a very good one. As I’ve mentioned, I find the manager’s role on the touchline to be a vital aspect of match day.

    Thirdly, I feel there is a bit of an issue here, managers do need to set an appropriate example as they are in the public light most weekends and often on the back pages. Finally, I’m aware that the rules I’ve suggested are already in place, perhaps I wasn’t clear enough in my article, but really I would like to see the fourth officials exclusively deal with managers misbehaviour to prevent the on-field referee becoming distracted by off-field occurrences.

    I know in theory this is what the rules outline but in practice the on-field referee often stops the game to deal with unruly managers, something which annoys me personally a little bit, hence the article.


    Reply Report

Leave a comment

Please note our disclaimer relating to comments submitted. Please do not post pretending to be another person. Nouse is not responsible for user-submitted content.