The Naked Truth

Cartoon by

In Milton’s Paradise Lost, Adam and Eve walk around naked due to the fact that there was “not guilty shame of nature’s works”. In other words, until the biblical fall occurs, their nudity was not an offence and it was therefore shameless and innocent. I do believe that if there ever was a time when nudity could be pure and free of sexual connotations, that time has long since passed.

As of 19th November, it is an offence to be publicly nude in San Francisco, the city once renowned for its liberal attitudes towards public nudity. The ban, passed by six votes to five by the board of supervisors, has marked the end of social nudity’s reign across the city.

Following the announcement, two women stripped off at a city hall where the result was broadcasted. Yes, it has been highlighted many times before that we live in an overtly sexualised society.

Why ban this innocent form of nudity, a supposed public weapon against the sexualisation of the human form? Who can look at the monochromatic images of bare breasted festival goers of the early seventies and not feel a touch of reminiscence? I believe that to assume the naked body maintains purity, at such a point in our social history, is a form of denial.

The legal system should reflect the particular social mood of the society it serves. This idea is reflected by the numerous pop quizzes and board games which mock obscure laws that are no longer observed. The law stating that camel hunting is legal in Arizona, is obscure at first; yet when it is observed that, between 1856 and 1857, camels were imported to that region in order to haul supplies across the desert for the army, it makes contextual sense. Likewise, in this case, we have entered an era where nudity is so sexualised, that it can no longer be detached from sexual connotations. Bare breasts are no longer an artistic celebration of the human form. Such nudity, for our generation, is found within illicit magazines, sexually charged music videos, and pornography.

We must accept, nudity is now offensive to the majority and that it should not be practised in public, often imposed on those who do not request to be exposed to it.

Since the late sixties, San Francisco has been seen as America’s focal point for social nudity. Three clothing optional beaches lie within the city’s borders and nudity within the context of the late sixties and early seventies is arguably fitting for the spirit of the times. What jarred with its decade was the gathering of nudists in a Plaza in the Castro district, shortly after its opening in 2010, when those who walked nude in the Plaza were accused of having no standards. The times when nudity could be explained away with the three-word cliché of ‘freedom of expression’ were left in the sixties.

The nudists received their first blow from the California Alcohol Beverage Commission (ABC) in 1972. Only five years after the Summer of Love, ABC issued a ruling which banned nudity in establishments which sold alcohol, in response to venues such as the Condor Club, which featured topless go-go dancers who soon progressed to full nudity.

The ABC put two and two together and concluded that any establishment serving alcohol to nude clients was no different from a brothel. If this wasn’t alright in the early seventies, the whole concept of social nudity in the street is embarrassingly out of date now.

But not all is lost for the naturists of San Francisco. The ban will not restrict nudity during parades, meaning that several clothing optional events, such as the Gay Pride weekend, will be unaffected by the recent changes. Yet we have not entered the social era in which costume merchants can expect to see an improvement in sales at this time of the year.


  1. Of course, this is complete nonsense. Nudity, and the acceptance therof, is the means by which we de-sexualize the human body. Anyone truly concerned about society’s objectification of body parts, and the subsequent consequential damage to the body acceptance of so many of our young people, would advocate MORE public nudity, not less, as a means of fostering a more realistic and wholesome image of nude human beings. Look to the organizations which support social nudism and naturism, such as British Naturism, The Naturist Society, and the American Association for Nude Recreation for the truth about how being nude in social situations is beneficial for mind, body and spirit.

    Reply Report

  2. Ms. Parker –

    Your selection of the situation in San Francisco as an example of the state of nudism is unfortunate, and serves only to highlight your lack of awareness of the difference between nudism/naturism, public nudity and exhibitionism. Both sides behaved poorly, and closeness of the vote makes it clear that the feeling about nudity in San Francisco is not unanimous.

    I won’t take up a lot of space here in the comments section explaining, but have a look at the three web sites I will post below.

    Before you condemn nudity and nudism forever, read about it and talk to people at these organizations. Then, try going to a nudist event sponsored by British Naturism just once. If you still think nudity is dreadful and dirty, so be it. But don’t knock it until you’ve tried it.

    Reply Report

  3. The correct URL for British Naturism is

    The evidence is crystal clear, the censorious attitudes advocated by this article result in widespread and often serious harm. Ever wondered why the most censorious western nations have several times the teenage abortion rate, about 10 times the teenage pregnancy rate and several tens of times the sexually transmitted infection rates? Attitudes have consequences.

    Which is more important, harm to children and young people or upset to a few misguided adults?

    Reply Report

  4. i live in san francisco in the castro neighborhood, zip code 94114, one of the most erudite and liberal communities in this country. there is a reason why i and my neighbors objected to the naked people in my city, a fact which is never mentioned in the media … several of the naked guys are perverts, plain and simple. they wear cheap ersatz wigs and dark sunglasses and walk around naked wearing “jewelry” with strategic body parts oiled-up and they walk around where they can confront the most tourists and mothers with strollers, etc. they are perverts. any real nudist knowing what is going in san francisco, would distance themselves from these perverts and i’m sick of hearing people calling them nudists.

    Reply Report

Leave a comment

Please note our disclaimer relating to comments submitted. Please do not post pretending to be another person. Nouse is not responsible for user-submitted content.