Disabled student facilities placed on top floor

Photo credit: Philippa Grafton

Photo credit: Philippa Grafton

Concerns have been raised regarding the disabled facilities in the new Langwith buildings on the Heslington East campus.

Last week members of the Langwith JCRC raised their concerns with the University over the fact that the rooms which catered for disabled students, which have lower sinks and appliances, had been placed on the top floor of one the new Langwith Buildings.

Lauren Bray, Langwith Welfare Rep explained that this was problematic as, in an emergency or even a fire drill the lifts would automatically shut down leaving any disabled students with “no way of getting out of the building of their own accord.”

She added: “Disabled students would have to wait for a fire officer or a member of the emergency services to carry them down stairs.”
The issue was raised at YUSU’s Disabled Students’ Network, where the implications of this matter were also discussed.

Emma Hersey, YUSU Disabled Students Officer, said: “I will be raising this issue with the University as I am very concerned about these planning decisions, as they do not seem to have been taken with the best interests of disabled students in mind.”

Bray commented on the situation saying that: “It seems like a massive over sight for a campus which is meant to be ‘so wonderful’, it just demonstrates a lack of common sense”.

Concerns about the design of the new building were also raised by Bob Hughes, YUSU Welfare Officer. He stated that he was “still a bit concerned that the planning went ahead this way, and I think that students with mobility issues should be put in ground floor rooms wherever possible.”

Anna Lewis, a second-year History and Politics student, commented that she thought these plans were “a massive oversight, a waste of money and hardly encourages disabled students to come to York”.

Suzanne Dekker, Langwith College Administrator, was questioned about whether she had heard of any problematic issues, but she said: “I have not heard of any issues with the buildings. I have only heard really positive things”.

However, when the concerns were highlighted to Dekker she commented that: “The Fire Officer also works out a personal escape plan for anyone with special needs or disabilities to ensure they can escape should the unthinkable happen”.

Dekker added: “These rooms are not just for wheelchair users, indeed they are usually occupied by students with other needs and, more often than not, by able bodied students.”

She continued that in her 12 years of involvement in University life, she had found that “demand for these rooms is fairly low”.
Hughes also added: “I have had some assurances that the lift operates regardless of fire (unlike many lifts where the power stops working in this circumstance).”

Indeed, Mick Elliot, the University Fire Safety Officer commented: “There is no problem with the design in terms of fire safety.” However, there are still concerns that the perception of placing accessible rooms, which cater for disabled students, on the top floor of the new Langwith building on Heslington East, might discourage disabled students from applying to York.


  1. 22 May ’12 at 1:48 pm

    Student In The Know.

    These facilities could be good for students with severe depression or anxiety or other mental health conditions. The article focuses on a very narrow definition about disability.

    Additionally the facilities could be useful for students who develop disabilities at University, but who did not have any known disabilities before attending. The facilities could also be used by students who experience abuse or domestic violence on campus, and develop anxieties constituting a disability.

    Still, most disabled students prefer to be on the ground floor so clearly there was an error of judgment.

    Reply Report

  2. 22 May ’12 at 4:20 pm

    Student Who Read The Article

    Yes, anxieties, depression and the like are forms of disabilities. But do individuals with those disabilities require rooms with lower appliances and sinks? I’d argue that they don’t.

    Reply Report

  3. @ Studentwhoreadthearticle

    The point was that the facilities could be used by other students, not just ‘stereotypically’ disabled students. The room has those facilities (lower appliances and sinks etc) because it is a multi-purpose room.

    Reply Report

  4. Erm @student (not so) in the know, mental disabilities are completely irrelevant here. It’s about someone with a physical disability who requires an accessible room with lower sinks etc having to be on the top floor. And why are high rooms good for depressed people… unless you’re making a really black joke

    Reply Report

  5. These rooms are appropriate for students with dwarfism. Wheelchair users are not the only disabled people on campus.

    Reply Report

  6. These room are also appropriate for students who are under 17 and may not have reached puberty yet. We can always improvise… the rooms can be put to good use…………………………somehow?

    Reply Report

  7. 23 May ’12 at 11:01 am

    Oliver Blackburn

    Mult purpose? So someone with a non-wheelchair based disability has to have a low sink just because they only bothered to design one style of diabled access room?

    Someone has made a serious design error here, however we try and find an appropriate use for the room.

    Reply Report

  8. How has it taken this long for this issue to be raised? How many people were involved in the designs that failed to notice this?

    Reply Report

Leave a comment

Please note our disclaimer relating to comments submitted. Please do not post pretending to be another person. Nouse is not responsible for user-submitted content.