Where did it go wrong?

President Obama’s approval rating has tumbled, state voters have turned against him, and his legislative pushes have stalled. asks

The location, Washington’s National Mall, is the same. The backdrop, Capitol Hill, is the same. The crowds, chanting and waving banners, number the same. The object of their attention, President Barack Obama, is the same.

But the scenes of January, when thousands packed Washington’s streets to exalt in the election of a President “to change America”, are a far cry from the angry, violent protests that have marked his adminstration this year, and driven his approval rating below 50% barely eleven months since his inauguration.

In January, a relaxed Barack Obama strolled down Pennsylvania Avenue, self-assuredly showing the world he was calm in the face of his detractors. Today, chilling slogans and movements call for his head, and White House staff fear for his safety at previously innocuous public engagements.

Thousands flocked to Washington this September to condemn the actions of a man elected on a sea of positivity just ten months previously. Banners labeled him a ‘socialist’, posters depicted him as a modern-day Adolf Hitler and chants demanded him to “show us the birth certificate”, in support of the ‘birther’ movement that came to prominence this summer and accuses Obama of being a non-US citizen.

Obama-sponsored legislation is stalling, and White House-backed candidates have lost state elections. Democratic members of Congress are rebelling, and his closest supporters in the press are starting to distance themselves from the President. For Americans, the Obama dream is over.

gallup poll

Yet in Europe and in the majority of countries across the world, he is still a man adored and revered, a man to take climate change seriously, mend decades of aggressive and failed US foreign policy against the Muslim world and bring peace to the Middle East. A recent Pew Global study found that in Europe, his support shows no sign of disappearing. Results showed that French and German voters have more confidence in Obama than in Sarkozy and Merkel, their respective leaders.

Obama was elected President of the United States by the people of that country. But for the first time in recent history, ‘The Most Powerful Man in the World’ also had the planet’s backing to make that grand title ring true. The world expected, and America expected. But what if we all expected too much?

President Obama is spread too thin. Not only expected to resurrect a Democratic party that had been loosely bonded together in mutual hatred of the Bush Adminstration, left-leaning voters demanded long-overdue climate change and healthcare legislation. But then right-wing voters who defected from the GOP wanted an economic package to stimulate a sluggish economy – and tax hikes aren’t going to please them. Then there’s the lobbyist and military pressure over Afghanistan and America’s continued presence as Israel’s strongest supporter to juggle with the world’s expectations on him to clean up America’s record overseas and resurrect its tarnished foreign policy.

So far, he’s achieved little. His acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize in October had the critics sharpening their knives, and his supporters bewildered. After almost eleven months in office, he has little to cheer about.

Obama, who was inaugurated with an approval rating of 68%, stuck to the party line and to campaign promises, and has seen his personal support among Americans sacrificed for the passage of bills that the Democrats have been waiting to pass for over 35 years. Not since Jimmy Carter left the White House in 1981 have the Democrats had control of The Oval Office, the House of Representatives and the Senate at the same time, and it’s been a case of making up for lost time as fast as possible.

Gore’s paper-thin loss in 2000 and Kerry’s implosion with the Presidency on a plate in 2004 confirmed that the Democrats were the jittery losers that many commentators feared they were. So, when Obama – who would surely make it eight years of Blue at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue – won the party nomination, hands were rubbed gleefully and decade-old legislation that Republican fili-busters and Presidential vetoes had curtailed for so long was dusted off and prepped for re-drafting.

This forcing through of legislation, and the compromises that have had to be made in order to move the bills through quickly, has been the real drain on the Obama dream. The Bailout Bill to support failing banks, the Cap and Trade Bill which places taxes on non-renewable energy, and pledges huge government spending for clean fuels and the recent Healthcare Reform Bill which saw thousands of protestors mobilise across the country in opposition to its potential to create ‘socialised medicine’ have all dragged the President’s ratings to their lowest-ever level.

Lower-class Americans are appalled by the President’s concessions in the Healthcare Bill to appease Republican lawmakers, both anti-war campaigners and the hawks in the Pentagon are upset by the President’s flip-flop attitude to Afghanistan, and blue-collar workers across the 50 states are wondering why their taxes are increasing while at the same time unemployment is soaring.

The criticism is simple: since entering office, Obama has focused on Congress and the foreign arena, and – distracted by both – has lost touch with the people that voted him in, and who will have the choice to vote him and his Democratic colleagues in again.

In the face of his domestic failings, some US commentators have slammed the President’s apparent aspiration to help the world before he helps America. John Danforth, a former US Ambassador to the UN, remarked that while it is good to have a popular President, the US does not reap the benefits from other governments. “It’s nice to be popular [abroad],” said Danforth, “but I just don’t see the seeds of a partnership in this information.” “He really is a rock star,” he said of Obama, but “my response is, ‘So what?’”

But a drive through Wheat Ridge, Colorado, quickly confirms that people here don’t think of their President as a rock star. His face might be on a bill-board, but it’s a cartoon of him wearing a turban with the slogan “PRESIDENT or JIHAD?”. The comparison of Obama with a Muslim terrorist is chilling, as is the smaller message, which reads: “WAKE UP AMERICA! REMEMBER FT. HOOD!”, in reference to the mass-killing of US soldiers at a base in Texas by a Muslim Army psychiatrist last month.

“Since Fort Hood, I’ve had it…You can’t suggest things. You can’t profile. You gotta call a spade a spade,” the billboard’s owner Phil Wolf told FOX News. “Everything I have read about Mr. Obama points right to the fact that he is a Muslim. And that is the agenda of what Muslim is all about. It’s about anti-American, it’s about anti-Christianity.”

It is an ominous trend that is growing as fast as ‘Obama for President’ t-shirt sales soared in late 2008. The Christian right have weighed in with their own disturbing anti-Obama messages, and an alarming new popular bumper sticker states: ‘Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8’. What appears to be a supportive sentiment of their beleaguered President is quite the contrary. The Psalm in question reads: “Let his days be few; and let another take his office”, while the following verse chillingly states: “Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.”

David Axelrod, the man who masterminded Obama’s journey to the White House has publicly voiced fears for the President’s safety, specifically targeting the Tea Party organisation that has sprung up across the country as an aggressive anti-government movement. In September, authorities moved to shut down a poll on Facebook that asked whether respondents thought Obama should be killed.

People are starting to take note. The Anti-defamation League of America report, ‘Rage Grows in America: Anti‑Government Conspiracies’, published a few weeks ago condemned the right-wing media in particular for “demonizing President Obama and promoting conspiracy theories about his administration… [which] may result in an increase in anti-government extremists and the potential for a rise of violent anti-government acts.”

But it’s difficult to just write these attacks off as right-wing nut-jobs pining for a return to the glorious Bush years. Support for Obama isn’t just falling among ordinary American voters: even his Democratic Congressional colleagues are becoming more vociferous about a man that they saw as a saviour of the party just a year ago. John Conyers, the prominent liberal black Congressman from Michigan, attacked Obama’s weak leadership and accused him of “bowing down to every nutty right-wing proposal about healthcare”. The concessions, Conyers continued “are a disservice to the Barack Obama I first met.”

Then, as reports showed an ever-increasing number of unemployed Americans and a rising number of defaulted mortgages, a vote on financial reforms proposed by White House policymakers was pulled at the last minute as black caucus members, formerly the President’s closest allies, threatened to vote against it in protest of wider economic policy.

The Republicans, like any good opposition, are doing all they can to make this uncomfortable period as prolonged as possible. Cap and Trade and the Healthcare Bill are still awaiting Senate confirmation, and the longer that bills take to be debated, the longer they stay on the front pages. Not only does this anger left-wing voters who expected Obama to pass these measures quickly, it also allows Republican strategists to maximise the critical sentiment. And with the Mid-terms looming like the scales of justice above the US Capitol to judge the Administration’s first 24 months, right now all publicity is bad publicity.

As Republican leaders unabashedly contemplated picking up Senate seats across the country from Obama-tarred Democratic incumbents, one conservative commentator told the Sunday Times, “We don’t need to slam Obama – his own folks are doing it themselves.”

This sentiment, of Democratic implosion in the face of Obama’s sliding approval rating, bubbled over in the wake of October’s gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia, and confirmed for the first time a swing from the Democrats at the ballot box.

Virginia, which had voted for Obama after 50 years of support for Republican Presidential candidates, and New Jersey, traditionally a Democratic-voting state, both voted to oust Democratic incumbents in what many commentators saw as an opinion poll on 12 months of the Obama Administration.

While Democratic officials insisted that the vote was not a referendum on his presidency, many in Washington felt that it reflected widespread disillusionment with Obama over the weak economy, job losses and the ongoing debate over healthcare reform.


David Gergen, the US political scientist and commentator, told CNN: “It shows the way the wind is blowing … the Democrats can’t take power for granted,” while one Democratic adviser told the New York Times that the Virginia vote was “a race between Barack Obama’s spending and Bob McDonnell’s thesis,” referring to the Republican candidate’s controversial University paper regarding women and homosexuals.

The White House was directly involved in both races. Aides were sent to review advertisements and attend strategy sessions, and Obama himself campaigned with Virginia incumbent Craig Deeds twice, and took part in last-minute rallies in New Jersey for Democratic candidate John Corzine.

With polls suggesting that African Americans, Latinos and young voters – who had elected Obama in 2008 – had swayed away from the Democrats, the Republicans were elated. Michael Steele, the Republican national chairman, said: “We have a long way to go to prepare for next year [when congressional elections are held] but it is a great night to celebrate…This is not just about Virginia but about the leadership in the White House and in Congress.” In 2008 an eight-year Obama administration seemed almost inevitable, but if the current slide away from the Democrats continues, Republican candidates could stand a very good chance come 2012 of swinging the White House their way.

Eighteen months ago, Obama was supported by over 95% of countries polled by The Economist before the election. The world wanted him, and moreover, wanted him to deliver. Now, it seems that support and the pressure that comes with it have similarly harmed his US approval.

It hasn’t helped that the world’s expectations were wild and varied. Obama was cautious not to completely nail his colours to the mast in terms of a climate change policy, but this didn’t stop green campaigners across the world exalting at the prospect of a US President that would finally agree to Kyoto-like pledges.

The Cap and Trade Bill, loved and loathed in equal doses across Washington, was a step in the right direction for Al Gore and his followers, but was a crippling tax on an already struggling US economy for voters across the country. The Senate are yet to tackle it head-on, stuck as it is in the log-jam of bills that Republican law-makers are doing all they can to delay.

In only the past week, emails leaked from the University of East Anglia exposing an alleged plot to ‘cover-up’ scientific research that discredits the global warming theory are spreading across Washington like a congressional wildfire. Some commentators on both sides of the Atlantic are claiming that these revelation, with the backing of Fox News’ omnipotent anti-Obama rhetoric, may mean Cap and Trade is “toast”.

Even earlier in his term, the closure of Guantanamo Bay, the illegal detention centre that for many exemplified Bush’s loathed presidency and disasterous foreign policy, was lauded by people across the planet. Obama was praised for enacting a campaign pledge so early in his term, and for actively seeking to repair the US’s awful reputuation overseas.

Yet the American public, initially skeptical of an effective admittance that the camp was illegal, turned hostile when it was suggested by the Administration that large numbers of former inmates would be transferred to jails in the US. The plan stalled, Gregory Craig, Obama’s former White House Counsel was made the scapegoat and fired after being labelled “too close to human rights groups” by White House whispers, and the squeaky-clean image of a President looking to clean up politics both at home and abroad took another hit.

Ambitious overseas trips to China and the Middle East have also come with little reward, save a few mumbled promises from a reluctant Hu Jintao and a bullish Benjamin Netanyahu

There is also a flip-side to the hope thrown on Obama last November. Bob Ainsworth, the British Defence Secretary, took the audacious step of blaming Obama for falling UK support for the war in Afghanistan last month.

Ainsworth claimed that a “period of hiatus” in Washington, and a lack of clear direction, had hindered the British government’s efforts to whip up public support for a continuation of the conflict. It seems that the US President is responsible not only for his own cabinet, but ours as well.

A trip to the Far East that Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel had reportedly hoped would boost his ratings as a leader on the world stage monumentally backfired when photos of the President bowing to Japan’s Emperor Akihito hit the Los Angeles Times, and were picked up by the hugely influential Matt Drudge’s drudgereport.com. It was a carbon-copy of the PR disaster that unfolded when Obama did the same thing in April to the King of Saudi Arabia. Americans were aghast at the action, and the condemnation of a President that shows deference to other foreign leaders flowed.

So where does Obama go from here? His two legislative stumbling blocks, Cap and Trade and Healthcare, will either require an ugly Democratic smash-and-grab job while Republicans and the mighty Fox News cry foul, or a host of concessions that will render the final product spineless.

The President needs to refocus on his electorate. Ignoring Congress and the global expectations is easy to say and hard to implement, but is necessary if his personal attraction is to be enough to stem a Republican upswing at the looming mid-terms.

If Obama doesn’t turn back to the ordinary American people soon and work for their best interests, there’s a strong danger that at least one House won’t be his for very long.

Charting the fall







  1. “Jimmy Carter left the White House in 1981 have the Democrats had control of The Oval Office, the House of Representatives and the Senate at the same time”

    Just thought I’d point out the Democrats held the White House, the Senate and the HoR from 93-95, during the Clinton presidency.

    Reply Report

  2. Simon,

    Yeah, you’re right. Good spot. However, their small majority meant Clinton could make little legislative headway, perhaps best illustrated by his failure to pass anti-homophobia laws in relation to the military and any national healthcare legislation. As such, Obama is the first Democratic President to hold the White House, HoR and Senate, with a filibuster.

    Thanks for your comment.


    Reply Report

  3. 9 Dec ’09 at 1:13 pm

    Ieuan Ferrer

    I find it interesting that in this article there is not one mention of Reagan.

    When he got in his approval ratings were very high. There was also a recession on. A year or so after he was inaugurated, Reagan’s popularity hit a low at around 50%. Reagan’s popularity started to improve as the economy bounced back and he is now considered the most popular president of all time (according to various polls).

    No matter what people assume/may tell you, at the start his views did not reflect those of the whole of the US. He was, however, an excellent orator and a very persuasive politician. By the time the 1984 election came around he won by a massive landslide.

    The parallels, as far as I can see, are striking.

    When it comes to representing the people’s views, the US is such a politically polarised place (more so now than when Reagan was President) that is very difficult to do so in any real sense. However, due to the broken nature of the US constitution there is much that is broken about the laws that govern the country. Obama has the best opportunity in decades to change it.

    Obama has compromised and straddled the middle ground very well so far. He has signalled his willingness to drop the public option from the healthcare bill (and the Senate will most likely remove it), so as to avoid the worst of the flack from the right. He has promised to massively increase troop numbers in Afghanistan, and soon, whilst demonstrating that the US commitment is not open-ended – so as to please the hawks and the doves.

    There is a lot that could go wrong from here, and of course the analogy with Reagan’s situation is not perfect, but as far as I’m concerned ‘where did it go wrong?’ is the wrong question. 50% is not a catastrophic approval rate at all – especially as the unemployment rate is above 10%. Assuming the economy improves (which, admittedly, it might not) I would be very surprised if it doesn’t turn out that his approval ratings improve significantly over the next few years.

    Reply Report

  4. 10 Dec ’09 at 5:31 pm

    Khalid A Monsour

    Why has Mr. Obama spent over $1.5M paid to Perkins Coie Law Firm to keep his original birth certificate, college transcripts, passport and other records hidden from the American public?

    Why was his first order of business after the inauguration to sign an executive order ensuring these records are kept sealed?

    Reply Report

  5. “Why has Mr. Obama spent over $1.5M paid to Perkins Coie Law Firm to keep his original birth certificate, college transcripts, passport and other records hidden from the American public?”

    Conspiracy theories, my friend, are the opiate of the stupid – http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

    Reply Report

  6. The Joker – Anarchism (wanted to cause havok and distruction against any means of authority as he didn’t believe in any whatsoever)

    Obama – Trying to fix some wrongs by Bush and use a less confrontational foreign policy as well as introducing a better health care system… Not exactly Anarchy is it. Some would he socialist but i would definately say more liberal than previous Presidents of the USA but still a member of the Democrats….

    So i am failing to understand the comparision…..

    Reply Report

  7. But still cool picture…

    Reply Report

  8. Where Did It Go Wrong?

    After Obama’s first month in office, a lot of people fooled by his campaign rhetoric began to recognize who he really was. His cabinet selections, lack of experince, arrogant approach to governing and radical political ideology were broadcast every minute of every day.

    As far as comparing Obama to Reagan – Please.

    As a senior American, I can tell you there’s no comparison between Ronald Wilson Reagan and Barack Hussein Obama.

    Reagan never befriended anyone who demeaned, stood or spit on the American Flag.

    Reagan never befriended anyone involved in domestic terrorist activities.

    Reagan never belonged to a church that condoned or encouraged sermons condemning America or preached racism and hatred.

    Reagan never appointed or allowed a known communist to operate within our government.

    Reagan never appointed cabinet members with IRS issues.

    Reagan never appointed an Attorney General who particpated in pardons for convicted terrorists.

    Reagan never concealed any personal information about his marriages, birth, draft status or school records.

    Reagan never belonged to or worked for an organization (ACORN) with ties to so many dubious groups.

    Reagan never befriended people who admitted involvement in planting bombs at police stations and government buildings.

    On and on and on.

    I believe conservatives will be elected to our house and senate in 2010 and Mr. Obama will not be re-elected in 2012. Socialism will NOT prevail in America.

    Reply Report

  9. 13 Dec ’09 at 1:07 pm

    Big Dong Donkey Kong

    @Kalid. http://conspiracyscience.com/articles/obama/obama-was-not-born-in-the-united-states/ Hope you find this useful :)

    I know rite? We should totally have a teabagging party in protest of this socialist fascist communist muslin terrorist!

    Reply Report

  10. @Mary

    Wow, a lot of really terrible points made there…

    “Reagan never befriended anyone who demeaned, stood or spit on the American Flag.” – You don’t and have no possible way of knowing this, why claim it?

    “Reagan never appointed cabinet members with IRS issues.” – Really? You have in-depth knowledge if the tax issues of every single person Reagan appointed to the cabinet and know that every single one was squeaky clean?

    “Reagan never concealed any personal information about his marriages, birth, draft status or school records.” – Because he was white and gave racists no cause to raise the issue of his place of birth?

    You make more than one reference to the Bill Ayers issue, despite the two men not associating closely with each other and Obama condemning Ayers’ past. They served on advisory boards together, Obama didn’t seek out and befriend him.

    In regard to the ACORN thing, Reagan was president of GE, an company who built and tested nukes (WMDs!!!!) and have some iffy accounting practices of their own. It isn’t mentioned much as it is totally irrelevant to the role he performed as president (this is an analogy, feel free to apply it to other things).

    Reagan was however an actor and appeared in the following films: “John Loves Mary”, “The Rear Gunner”, “Stallion Road”, “Smashing the Money Ring”, “The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse” and “Hellcats of the Navy”. In the spirit of not researching my opinions, I haven’t watched any of these, but it seems a little… suspicious that they all have titles that could be hardcore pornography, no? Maybe we should protest about him corrupting our youth? Seems odd no-ones denying the accusation he was a pornographer doesn’t it?

    @Big Dong Donkey Kong I am well up for some teabagging. I was well aware Obama was a socialist facist communist, but you have evidence that he’s not human but in fact made of cotton? (TYPO LOLZ!!!1)

    Reply Report

  11. My Dear Sea Biscuit

    I don’t see that I made one terrible point – and neither do you. How could I know this? Because your moronic reply tells anyone who reads it so. And, my dear Mr. Biscuit, your response is so very typical of a liberal without a proper rebuttal or logical answer.

    Being the President of GE is hardly a comparison to ACORN. WMDs? Porn? Corrupting our youth? Give me a break. If you think the democrats confirmed Reagan’s choices without close scrutiny; you’re a bigger buffoon than Al Gore or John Kerry.

    As far as Obama, Ayers and Dohrn are concerned – I would suggest you do a little research and be honest with yourself. Look into the Woods Fund of Chicago and Chicago Annenberg Challenge. These people are Chicago politicos, Mr. Biscuit.

    Like others of your ideology, I fear you opt to be ignorant rather than admit you’re wrong.

    Reply Report

  12. ‘Mary Bee’ is absolutely spot on and has mentioned all the points I would have noted against Obama and his socialistic agenda. The only point I’d differ on is in regard to his concealment of birth certificates and related documents. As much as I oppose Obama and all he stands for, such dubious attacks on his birth state and schooling hold no genuine credibility and supporting such arguments will only make the conservative opponents look worse than he is. Conservatives can simply destroy him and his radical agenda through exposing his true socialistic agenda and its risk to the people of America.
    The ACORN association is a very credible point to highlight and just shows what environment Obama comes from and the mind-set he adopts. Corrupt Chicago politics and radical associates make up the Obama political foundations.
    Trying to be the worlds ‘best friend’ will only open up Obama as a weak military leader.
    Criticize Geroge W. Bush all you want yet at least he kept America safe and prevented another terrorist attack on U.S soil post 9/11. He demonstarted to the world that the U.S and its allies will not be defeated by terrorism and that the democracy and liberity will flourish in the face of terror and work to destroy its core bases.
    A firm hand and decisive action is still needed; Obama does not offer this.
    Carefully considered and private sector healthcare reforms are needed. Not socialised medicine and governmental interference.
    A determination to bring terrorists to justice and prevent terrorism from thriving is necessary. Not releasing Guantanamo prisoners only for the vast majority to go on and commit terrrorist acts and rejoin cells.

    Obama may succeed and if so God help America and the world.

    Comment edited by a moderator

    Reply Report

  13. As much as I disagree with the whole ‘Obama birth conspiracy’ it is sweeping and ignorant of ‘Sea Biscuit’ to label them rascists.
    You’re counter examples are laughable and you made no credible point to dilute the importance and accuracy of the points made by ‘Mary Bee’.
    As for the crude comments regarding pornography…that just sums up the levels of intellect put forward by idiots on the left! Get a grip you fool!

    Reply Report

  14. What I love about the anti-Obama tirades is the constant use of socialist as a pejorative term. Never mind the fact that what Obama is advocating isn’t remotely socialist (especially now the public healthcare option has been dropped, by European standards he is actually slightly right of centre), what’s wrong so with making sure that those left well off have a safety net and don’t get shat on by amoral health insurance companies? Despite what some people think, it won’t create a crisis which will obliviate entrepreneurship and the free market or lead to a culture of people relying on the state.

    Peace, love, and state intervention. x

    Reply Report

  15. 13 Apr ’10 at 9:18 am

    John Martial King

    Read Obama Prophecy in full, read the PSALMS CODE:


    Reply Report

Leave a comment

Please note our disclaimer relating to comments submitted. Please do not post pretending to be another person. Nouse is not responsible for user-submitted content.