Comments on: The Nouse Top 50 http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/ Award-winning University of York Student Newspaper and Website Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:06:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: A comrade http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-62053 A comrade Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:11:32 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-62053 "Jason Rose says: July 1, 2009 at 12:33 am Agree with the above; choosing the first 50 people is silly; had I submitted myself in the first twenty minutes I would automatically have received a place? A little odd!" Frankly, I'm surprised that you didn't... :P “Jason Rose says:
July 1, 2009 at 12:33 am
Agree with the above; choosing the first 50 people is silly; had I submitted myself in the first twenty minutes I would automatically have received a place? A little odd!”

Frankly, I’m surprised that you didn’t… :P

]]> By: anon http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61358 anon Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:00:17 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61358 very 50 50 ! lacking any sense of being obviously out to stir which the vision one did and I loved it very 50 50 ! lacking any sense of being obviously out to stir which the vision one did and I loved it

]]> By: Alan Anal http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61188 Alan Anal Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:16:20 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61188 I don't know you Mr Burgandy, but I know of a Ron Burgundy. Awesome Anchorman. I don’t know you Mr Burgandy, but I know of a Ron Burgundy. Awesome Anchorman.

]]> By: Ron Burgandy http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61155 Ron Burgandy Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:01:04 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61155 Why aren't I on this list. I'm a big deal. People know me. Why aren’t I on this list.

I’m a big deal.

People know me.

]]> By: In opposition http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61122 In opposition Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:28:34 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61122 Really, why the need to shoot down something positive? I don't see the point. As for Ms On, three members of Nouse featuring on this list is hardly enough to justify an allegation of bias. Really, why the need to shoot down something positive? I don’t see the point.

As for Ms On, three members of Nouse featuring on this list is hardly enough to justify an allegation of bias.

]]> By: Mike Child http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61058 Mike Child Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:47:21 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61058 Indeed it must have been because there are some missing that I know I submitted early enough to have been included in the first 50. Kudos to TWF. Indeed it must have been because there are some missing that I know I submitted early enough to have been included in the first 50.

Kudos to TWF.

]]> By: Annie On http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61050 Annie On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:23:28 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61050 could we get a few more members of nouse in this list? i really didn't think there was enough. could we get a few more members of nouse in this list?

i really didn’t think there was enough.

]]> By: Em Brownbill http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61036 Em Brownbill Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:51:04 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61036 'Hope Not Hate' wasn't an LGBT campaign – you're probably looking for 'Love Without Borders'. Could that be corrected, please? ‘Hope Not Hate’ wasn’t an LGBT campaign – you’re probably looking for ‘Love Without Borders’. Could that be corrected, please?

]]> By: Nick http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61029 Nick Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:57:04 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61029 Really nice to be on the list, but just to point out that Charlie Ward also runs Kids Club and is equally deserving of a mention. Really nice to be on the list, but just to point out that Charlie Ward also runs Kids Club and is equally deserving of a mention.

]]> By: Tobias Ziegler http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61022 Tobias Ziegler Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:28:23 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61022 Definitely better than the Vision 'power(less) list'. ;-) Definitely better than the Vision ‘power(less) list’. ;-)

]]> By: Chris Northwood http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61015 Chris Northwood Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:50:42 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61015 The choosing process was a bit more complex than Sian made it out to be. The choosing process was a bit more complex than Sian made it out to be.

]]> By: Jason Rose http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61012 Jason Rose Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:33:45 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61012 Agree with the above; choosing the first 50 people is silly; had I submitted myself in the first twenty minutes I would automatically have received a place? A little odd! Agree with the above; choosing the first 50 people is silly; had I submitted myself in the first twenty minutes I would automatically have received a place? A little odd!

]]> By: Samuel Norman Seaborn http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61009 Samuel Norman Seaborn Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:35:48 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61009 It's all a bit of fun.... It’s all a bit of fun….

]]> By: Self-righteous Postgraduate http://www.nouse.co.uk/2009/06/30/the-nouse-top-50/#comment-61008 Self-righteous Postgraduate Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:44:34 +0000 http://www.nouse.co.uk/?p=15367#comment-61008 What's the justification for picking the first 50 nominations to be sent to you because the nominations exceeded 50 people? Surely you should have prioritised those who got more than one nomination, and if no one person did get more than one nomination (something I highly doubt when considering very popular people who've contributed a lot like Charlie Leyland and Tom Langrish), shouldn't those nominations received 51st, 52nd, 53rd, etc, ar least be given an honourable mention? What’s the justification for picking the first 50 nominations to be sent to you because the nominations exceeded 50 people? Surely you should have prioritised those who got more than one nomination, and if no one person did get more than one nomination (something I highly doubt when considering very popular people who’ve contributed a lot like Charlie Leyland and Tom Langrish), shouldn’t those nominations received 51st, 52nd, 53rd, etc, ar least be given an honourable mention?

]]>