Time for fundamental change in Turkey

Since their landslide victory in June, Turkey’s Islamist Justice and Development Party has increased in power and confidence

Turkey is often referred to as the land where East meets West, an Islamic country with a secular state. But there are those who fear for the future of Turkey, who see the secular waters of the Turkish republic increasingly muddied with the silt of religious doctrine.

Now with the lifting of the ban on Islamic headscarves within universities, the phobia of Turkey’s de-secularisation is growing. Many see this as the first major sign of Islamic political control and the beginning of a ‘new Turkey’, but there is also the sense that the ‘issue’ is being magnified by secular media.

With hundreds of thousands gathering last month to protest against the lifting of the ban it seems the two sides of to the country are not in harmony. The protesters, who were brandishing banners that carried the messages “We are the soldiers of Atatürk,” and “Turkey is secular and will remain secular!” are part of a large majority who have denounced the in power Justice and Development Party (AKP).

Though the Islamic rooted party has been in office for five years it was not until their landslide victory in June of last year that they had any real weight. The secular military staged rallies, flexing its political muscles to remind the party of Turkey’s repeated history of military coups. But with the victory, and the succession of party leader, Abdullah Gül as president, the party has gained a new confidence, sporting the slogan; ‘the people have spoken’. This new found confidence has manifested itself with significant changes to the constitution.

Seville, who runs an art gallery in Istanbul, anticipates a break down in the freedoms of the Turkish people. Following the news of the election, her shock and dismay were palpable;  “Everyone is asking who voted for them, nobody wants them. It’s the backward people who think he (Gül) will make them rich.”

Of course one must question who exactly falls into the categories of ‘everyone’ and ‘backward’ with AKP’s 46.6% of the vote. She went on to compare the climate in Turkey to Iran before its Islamic revolution in 1979, “They are crazy, they want to make us like Iran…before [the revolution] the women had mini-skirts. Now they wear only what the Koran tells them.” I asked Seville what she would do if such a change came about; “I think I will leave, maybe I will go back to Cuba”. This reaction is not uncommon.

The country has been in a process of unremitting modernisation for over 80 years, save a few coup ‘interruptions’. Since Atatürks establishment of the republic of Turkey, its exclusion of religion from government has fiercely and proudly been upheld, with instances of parties being shut down  for being ‘too Islamic’

But why the almost fundamentalist vehemence to the preservation of the secular?

There is a subtle irony here: a non-democratic ban to impede what people fear will be the onset of a non-democratic Islamic government.

The ban that is being lifted was introduced 11 years ago, with the ousting of an ‘overly Islamist’ government. According to recent regulation of the Higher Education Board,  female students must not wear head scarves when submitting application photos or sitting exams, but over two-thirds of women use some form of head covering. As a result the ban has prevented many of these women pursuing further education. The AKP are calling this an issue of human rights, and with the party pushing for EU integration, they must be seen to be improving Turkey’s murky human rights track record. AKP’s Aziz Babuscu sums up the party line; “We can’t be expected to remain indifferent to social expectations…We shall do what is expected.”

Yet the worry for many is that ‘what is expected’ is Islam playing a larger role in public life. The AKP focus on the headscarf ban, rather than on laws granting human rights has caused concern. Gursel Tenkin, of the Republican Peoples Party, sees this as a thin end of the Islamic wedge; “they are planning more…they want to go ahead in stages.”

The issue will remain on the forefront of the secular  media in the upcoming months, even with the Prime Minister’s assurance that, “People who are devout and who cover their hair are in favour of secularism just like anyone else.” Some see this as a blip being blown out of proportion by the western media, but others like journalist Mehmet Ali Birand believe that “We must get ready to live in a completely transformed Turkey in 5-10 years.”


  1. The answer to your question “But why the almost fundamentalist vehemence to the preservation of the secular?” lies in the very fundamentals of Islam. Secularists who live in moslem countries perhaps understand this at the gut level in a way that inhabitants of non-moslem counties do not. This is not about fashion statements. The whole concept of a nation-state is a foreign concept to the Islamists, and that is what scares secularists. And, in my view, it should. They simply do not feel that they can afford to trust Islamists, because to them, the secularists believe, democracy is simply a means to an end.

    Reply Report

  2. John Nebi, I agree with you hundred percent. Parties like Turkey’s AKP is using democracy wagon as a tool to achieve their final dream life form which in no way tolerates different ideas. No ideology can tolerate ideologies that try to destruct itself, therefore democracy should not let itself be abused by any such islamist agendas. In brief, Christianity took 2000 years for its believers to dilute its undemocratic mind set on their societies. It is a long evolution process. Islam still needs more time as it came 600+ years after Christianity. It is inevitably transition to a more modern state as Turkey’s AKP is in a way in the workings of that route, however, the line is thin and dangerous as there may be short terms delays or back-stepping thanx to unnecessary insistence in removing turban ban in educational institutions. Religions are after all not democratic, they are dogmas and there is punishment enacted on those who choose not to believe. There is no choice given, disbelievers would burn in hell. Anyways, It is so unfortunate and pity that humanity is plagued by these so-called religions in which all of them surprisingly only came to one tribe the sons of Israel’s and in one particular location, not to Scandinavians, not to Japanese not to Spaniards, not to British, not to Turks, not to Afghans, but just for the people of Jerusalem. Amazing blunder of human logic and millions of deaths and still counting…

    Reply Report

  3. Many mistakes in your article:
    1- Turkey is not an Islamic country. Half of the nation have read the Koran in Arabic without understanding it, the other half have not read it at all. Is this Islam?
    2- Corruption, injustice, violence, theft and robberies, crimes of all sorts abound the country. Is this Islam?
    3- There is no such thing as the Islamic head scarf. Koran is not a fashion book.
    The “turban” (the so-called Islamic head scarf) does not serve Islam, nor the individual wearing it. It only serves a gigantic, false, religious textile industry.
    It is good that turban and all religious symbols are forbidden in state institutions.
    4-AKP is said to have 46&. It was the first time Turkey had elections by a computerized system. One wonders if something went wrong in the computer system.

    Reply Report

Leave a comment

Please note our disclaimer relating to comments submitted. Please do not post pretending to be another person. Nouse is not responsible for user-submitted content.