The criticism in this article is entirely constructive; any student endeavour, whether it be Fusion, a Drama barn play or even this newspaper, should be ready to accept, with good grace, as much or as little praise or criticism as it deserves.

If, as some people clearly feel, Fusion has room for improvement, what harm is there in setting the bar a little higher?

I was disappointed with Fusion - though the dancing was of a high quality, the whole affair was unfortunately mediocre - the dynamism of last year’s was lost; where were the props, spectacles, and innovations? It was to all intents and purposes a dance show - a good dance show - but still, not all it cracked up to be.

Also, I wouldn’t say the article contained ‘gross innacuracies’ - mistakes, yes, but still.
And how is it bitter?! You, anon, are obv bitter that Fusion didn’t get a five star review.

Just to apologise about the aforementioned ‘Spanish Soc’ faux pas. It will be corrected in the version of the review that appears in the paper itself.

As chair of Dance Society, i find it rather insulting that we are referred to as “Spanish Soc” just because we did a Flamenco style TAP piece, in which our dancers had our logo splashed all over their costumes..

I cant see how the writer can be seen to be perceptive when necessary details such as this our over-looked..for heaven’s sake, a programme was only £1 with all proceeds to charity..!

Still impressive though - if not a bit - well vanillia

Anyway, I’m looking forward to tonight, regardless of your opinion!