<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hackwood ousted by eight votes</title>
	<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/</link>
	<description>Award-winning University of York Student Newspaper</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48735</link>
		<author>Liz</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48735</guid>
		<description>I am astounded by the comment that Dan Taylor directed at the 'women about women's rights'. I think it incredibly brave of her to have spoken out at the UGM. Surely such a comment as that, a violent and misogynist comment, loses him any credibility that he has had, along with his comments about Grace F-H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am astounded by the comment that Dan Taylor directed at the &#8216;women about women&#8217;s rights&#8217;. I think it incredibly brave of her to have spoken out at the UGM. Surely such a comment as that, a violent and misogynist comment, loses him any credibility that he has had, along with his comments about Grace F-H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48710</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48710</guid>
		<description>Um...Yeah except John Prescott had an egg thrown at him, and reacted in a way not in keeping with his office, but hardly in a way that isn't understandable.
 I'm pretty confident though that if he got horribly drunk and punched a member of the public outside a Westminster pub then he might end up resigning. Anyway, its all over now I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;Yeah except John Prescott had an egg thrown at him, and reacted in a way not in keeping with his office, but hardly in a way that isn&#8217;t understandable.<br />
 I&#8217;m pretty confident though that if he got horribly drunk and punched a member of the public outside a Westminster pub then he might end up resigning. Anyway, its all over now I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48700</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48700</guid>
		<description>Just seen that the website didnt post... so here it is:-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/16/newsid_4098000/4098929.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just seen that the website didnt post&#8230; so here it is:-</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/16/newsid_4098000/4098929.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/16/newsid_4098000/4098929.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48699</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48699</guid>
		<description>May I remind people about an Incident on 16 May 2001 (see website attached)...

It boils down to the same thing... a 'figurehead' did something wrong... difference is that one remained in office for a further 5 years, the other was forced to resign within a month...

Think people... there are more important things in life than picking faults with the actions of people, whether they be right or wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I remind people about an Incident on 16 May 2001 (see website attached)&#8230;</p>
<p>It boils down to the same thing&#8230; a &#8216;figurehead&#8217; did something wrong&#8230; difference is that one remained in office for a further 5 years, the other was forced to resign within a month&#8230;</p>
<p>Think people&#8230; there are more important things in life than picking faults with the actions of people, whether they be right or wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48582</link>
		<author>Christina</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48582</guid>
		<description>Dan Taylor claims that he 'did not distribute any literature as her support group did, as if it were being run like some form of political campaign.' He also states that his campaign to remove Grace FH from office has been in no way personalised.

Well, aside from the proven defamatory mental health allegations made against Grace that refute that last point in particular, there's also the personal message he sent out to complete strangers who had joined the 'pro-Grace' group, urging them to vote for the motion of no-confidence. Some of the people who forwarded this to me has expressed their utter disbelief upon receiving this message. If that's isn't distributing literature and personalising a campaign, I don't know what is.

Incidentally, if anyone would like to see Dan Taylor's message, I have many copies I can send on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Taylor claims that he &#8216;did not distribute any literature as her support group did, as if it were being run like some form of political campaign.&#8217; He also states that his campaign to remove Grace FH from office has been in no way personalised.</p>
<p>Well, aside from the proven defamatory mental health allegations made against Grace that refute that last point in particular, there&#8217;s also the personal message he sent out to complete strangers who had joined the &#8216;pro-Grace&#8217; group, urging them to vote for the motion of no-confidence. Some of the people who forwarded this to me has expressed their utter disbelief upon receiving this message. If that&#8217;s isn&#8217;t distributing literature and personalising a campaign, I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
<p>Incidentally, if anyone would like to see Dan Taylor&#8217;s message, I have many copies I can send on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alumnus</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48482</link>
		<author>Alumnus</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48482</guid>
		<description>Dan, the comments made by yourself and others (such as Tom Crockett) about Grace's mental health were both disgusting and libellous - god knows what you were saying to students on an individual basis.

Grace made an awful mistake but she apologised readily. I suggest you borrow someone's West Wing DVDs and watch the episode "a proportionate response". Your response was anything but proportionate - a fact doubtless related to her status as your political adversary.

The only consolation in this is that you are so far removed from the mainstream of politics that you will quickly find yourself isolated once you've left the Heslington campus bubble. I shall raise a drink to your long-term irrelevence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, the comments made by yourself and others (such as Tom Crockett) about Grace&#8217;s mental health were both disgusting and libellous - god knows what you were saying to students on an individual basis.</p>
<p>Grace made an awful mistake but she apologised readily. I suggest you borrow someone&#8217;s West Wing DVDs and watch the episode &#8220;a proportionate response&#8221;. Your response was anything but proportionate - a fact doubtless related to her status as your political adversary.</p>
<p>The only consolation in this is that you are so far removed from the mainstream of politics that you will quickly find yourself isolated once you&#8217;ve left the Heslington campus bubble. I shall raise a drink to your long-term irrelevence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48432</link>
		<author>Katherine</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48432</guid>
		<description>Hmm well, but the reasons reiterated again and again included some things that weren't acceptable - I refer primarily to your facebook group which (although these comments have now been removed) included comments about her academic record (her taking a year off her studies) and to previous acts of drunkenness with a view to casting her as unbalanced. That was in my opinion unacceptable. You should have confined your campaign just to the action in question. I'm not claiming that your language was abusive but I don't think you've behaved with dignity in this affair. Although you have attempted to cast your role in this as non-personal, and while I have no doubt that those who voted were acting on a conviction of the justice of your claim, it's clear that the politics of vendetta initially prompted you to take the steps you did. As I said I don't know either party so I'm not interested in entering an extended debate with you - so I'll just say what I said before: I hope we can all put this behind us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm well, but the reasons reiterated again and again included some things that weren&#8217;t acceptable - I refer primarily to your facebook group which (although these comments have now been removed) included comments about her academic record (her taking a year off her studies) and to previous acts of drunkenness with a view to casting her as unbalanced. That was in my opinion unacceptable. You should have confined your campaign just to the action in question. I&#8217;m not claiming that your language was abusive but I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ve behaved with dignity in this affair. Although you have attempted to cast your role in this as non-personal, and while I have no doubt that those who voted were acting on a conviction of the justice of your claim, it&#8217;s clear that the politics of vendetta initially prompted you to take the steps you did. As I said I don&#8217;t know either party so I&#8217;m not interested in entering an extended debate with you - so I&#8217;ll just say what I said before: I hope we can all put this behind us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48427</link>
		<author>Jules</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48427</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

I don't know you and we will probably never meet. But I can honestly say I am glad about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know you and we will probably never meet. But I can honestly say I am glad about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fact Checker</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48426</link>
		<author>Fact Checker</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48426</guid>
		<description>Taylor making false mental health allegations:

http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/01/23/fletcher-hackwood-defiant-in-the-face-of-looming-no-confidence-vote/

Taylor on a friend (fellow conservative)'s facebook wall (since deleted - there are screenshots):

Daniel D Taylor (London) wrote
at 9:01pm on February 1st, 2008
Voting is online at yusu.org from MOnday tpo Thursday of next week. Get EVERYONE voting for the motion of no-confidence you possibly can. Drag them to their computers, do whatever it takes. This is our chance to get her! xxx

Dan Taylor (London) wrote
at 4:01pm on February 7th, 2008
When the US captured Saddam, they said; "We've got him". I am changing that to the feminine: "We got her".!! Drinks in Derwent Bar, Monday evening!
http://yorkuk.facebook.com/profile.php?id=222306279&#38;hiq=charlton%2Cchloe%2Cgeorgina


And another Taylor quote on the UGM:

“That girl about womens rights wants something done to her, preferably legal but pretty nasty.”
http://yorkuk.facebook.com/profile.php?id=507866820&#38;hiq=merry%2Ctom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor making false mental health allegations:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/01/23/fletcher-hackwood-defiant-in-the-face-of-looming-no-confidence-vote/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/01/23/fletcher-hackwood-defiant-in-the-face-of-looming-no-confidence-vote/</a></p>
<p>Taylor on a friend (fellow conservative)&#8217;s facebook wall (since deleted - there are screenshots):</p>
<p>Daniel D Taylor (London) wrote<br />
at 9:01pm on February 1st, 2008<br />
Voting is online at yusu.org from MOnday tpo Thursday of next week. Get EVERYONE voting for the motion of no-confidence you possibly can. Drag them to their computers, do whatever it takes. This is our chance to get her! xxx</p>
<p>Dan Taylor (London) wrote<br />
at 4:01pm on February 7th, 2008<br />
When the US captured Saddam, they said; &#8220;We&#8217;ve got him&#8221;. I am changing that to the feminine: &#8220;We got her&#8221;.!! Drinks in Derwent Bar, Monday evening!<br />
<a href="http://yorkuk.facebook.com/profile.php?id=222306279&amp;hiq=charlton%2Cchloe%2Cgeorgina" rel="nofollow">http://yorkuk.facebook.com/profile.php?id=222306279&amp;hiq=charlton%2Cchloe%2Cgeorgina</a></p>
<p>And another Taylor quote on the UGM:</p>
<p>“That girl about womens rights wants something done to her, preferably legal but pretty nasty.”<br />
<a href="http://yorkuk.facebook.com/profile.php?id=507866820&amp;hiq=merry%2Ctom" rel="nofollow">http://yorkuk.facebook.com/profile.php?id=507866820&amp;hiq=merry%2Ctom</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Elmahdi</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48415</link>
		<author>Adam Elmahdi</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48415</guid>
		<description>Surely this whole business has been blown WAY out of proportion. Although I didn't agree with her views all too often when I was a student, Grace seems to have devoted a lot to the SU over the last five years and it seems a shame such a minor incident has forced her out of the post. One suspects this has more to do with personalities rather than any sort of common sense, but alas, that sums up student politics in a nutshell....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely this whole business has been blown WAY out of proportion. Although I didn&#8217;t agree with her views all too often when I was a student, Grace seems to have devoted a lot to the SU over the last five years and it seems a shame such a minor incident has forced her out of the post. One suspects this has more to do with personalities rather than any sort of common sense, but alas, that sums up student politics in a nutshell&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48402</link>
		<author>Dan Taylor</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48402</guid>
		<description>Just in response to the post above me:

I keep hearing this being flung around by various individualsd that this campaign was run 'personally' and abusively. I entirely reject that claim being made. I would ask you to show me an example of when I have used terminology that fits your assertion. I have never name-called Grace, referred to her position rather than name as often as possible and did not distribute any literature as her support group did, as if it were being run like some form of political campaign. In contrast, have a look at the walls of the two facebook groups and see what side the name calling and personalised nature of attack has come from. I have been called everyname under the sun by most individuals who have not a single political argument left to debate sensibly. This personal attack initiated by me has, I am afraid, be conined in the realms of your imagination. Look at my writings on the matter in comment sections and on the facebook wall. I have tried to get this to the bottom-line basics: YUSU paid officer hitting a student and needing to resign for reasons iterated over and over and over again. I did this at the UGM- Grace did not. All the justifications of the attack (including Grace's apology) were centered on the fact that I was the 'victim' of the action, as well as the fact that Grace is only 5ft5 and me a lot larger. That is personalising the campaign and it has certainly not come from me. 

I can say that throughout, I have not name-called or said anything without evidence of some sort. I think one of the reasons the vote went the way it did, was because people saw the clear personal nature of Grace's support group and their attacks on the individual involved rather than the action committed.

I await Katherine, these examples of such 'bad-taste' in campaigning. Frankly though, I do think you are talking a load of rubbish for the reasons I have mentioned above.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in response to the post above me:</p>
<p>I keep hearing this being flung around by various individualsd that this campaign was run &#8216;personally&#8217; and abusively. I entirely reject that claim being made. I would ask you to show me an example of when I have used terminology that fits your assertion. I have never name-called Grace, referred to her position rather than name as often as possible and did not distribute any literature as her support group did, as if it were being run like some form of political campaign. In contrast, have a look at the walls of the two facebook groups and see what side the name calling and personalised nature of attack has come from. I have been called everyname under the sun by most individuals who have not a single political argument left to debate sensibly. This personal attack initiated by me has, I am afraid, be conined in the realms of your imagination. Look at my writings on the matter in comment sections and on the facebook wall. I have tried to get this to the bottom-line basics: YUSU paid officer hitting a student and needing to resign for reasons iterated over and over and over again. I did this at the UGM- Grace did not. All the justifications of the attack (including Grace&#8217;s apology) were centered on the fact that I was the &#8216;victim&#8217; of the action, as well as the fact that Grace is only 5ft5 and me a lot larger. That is personalising the campaign and it has certainly not come from me. </p>
<p>I can say that throughout, I have not name-called or said anything without evidence of some sort. I think one of the reasons the vote went the way it did, was because people saw the clear personal nature of Grace&#8217;s support group and their attacks on the individual involved rather than the action committed.</p>
<p>I await Katherine, these examples of such &#8216;bad-taste&#8217; in campaigning. Frankly though, I do think you are talking a load of rubbish for the reasons I have mentioned above.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48396</link>
		<author>Katherine</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48396</guid>
		<description>I'd like to think that not knowing personally either of the people most powerfully involved in this issue I could remain fairly detached. But truthfully I've never been so disappointed in York students -not at the outcome of the vote which has some justification and at least the illusion of due process - but at the whole tenor of the campaign conducted against Grace Fletcher-Hackwood. The language employed against her has been histrionic, abusive and thoroughly immature. I can't condone her actions but I'm sorry for her. I think I would have been far less sorry for her if Dan Taylor's campaign had been conducted with more dignity and less cheap shots. But as it is, I regret that a voice of unreason has been so successful. At least now we can hopefully put the issue behind us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to think that not knowing personally either of the people most powerfully involved in this issue I could remain fairly detached. But truthfully I&#8217;ve never been so disappointed in York students -not at the outcome of the vote which has some justification and at least the illusion of due process - but at the whole tenor of the campaign conducted against Grace Fletcher-Hackwood. The language employed against her has been histrionic, abusive and thoroughly immature. I can&#8217;t condone her actions but I&#8217;m sorry for her. I think I would have been far less sorry for her if Dan Taylor&#8217;s campaign had been conducted with more dignity and less cheap shots. But as it is, I regret that a voice of unreason has been so successful. At least now we can hopefully put the issue behind us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48382</link>
		<author>Anon</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48382</guid>
		<description>"i think the real question here is….
Was W.G. Grace the greatest Cricketer of all time and would he cope in the modern game?"

I'm sure he would've coped far better than England did today...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;i think the real question here is….<br />
Was W.G. Grace the greatest Cricketer of all time and would he cope in the modern game?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure he would&#8217;ve coped far better than England did today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Press Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48381</link>
		<author>Press Reader</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48381</guid>
		<description>Bollocks, Dan. You lied and lied and lied again throughout this campaign, why should anyone believe you now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bollocks, Dan. You lied and lied and lied again throughout this campaign, why should anyone believe you now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48362</link>
		<author>Dan Taylor</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48362</guid>
		<description>For the info of everyone, I did not go to the York Press nor did they ask me for a comment. Just to clear that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the info of everyone, I did not go to the York Press nor did they ask me for a comment. Just to clear that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48336</link>
		<author>Phil</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48336</guid>
		<description>Dan Taylor
February 7th, 2008 at 7:34 pm

"This is my final say on the matter."

So much of a final say, Mr. Taylor and co. has gone to the York Press...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Taylor<br />
February 7th, 2008 at 7:34 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;This is my final say on the matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>So much of a final say, Mr. Taylor and co. has gone to the York Press&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Jeynes</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48244</link>
		<author>Matthew Jeynes</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48244</guid>
		<description>As Sports Editor, I must say that I completely agree with brywn Webster's intriguing view, and would ask him to give his own points for and against the success of the great W.G. in the modern game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Sports Editor, I must say that I completely agree with brywn Webster&#8217;s intriguing view, and would ask him to give his own points for and against the success of the great W.G. in the modern game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48232</link>
		<author>Christina</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48232</guid>
		<description>James MacDougald; hear, hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James MacDougald; hear, hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48228</link>
		<author>Concerned</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48228</guid>
		<description>Why is this debate even carrying on? It is like discussing the outcome of a general-election when one side has taken a majority of seats: futile. The students voted on the issue and they voted for her removal. That is really all their is to say- it seems the only ones still talking are echoing this point or just want to have a go at Taylor. He gave us all the chance to vote on it and it was then out of the guy's hands. The students have decided and that is the end of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this debate even carrying on? It is like discussing the outcome of a general-election when one side has taken a majority of seats: futile. The students voted on the issue and they voted for her removal. That is really all their is to say- it seems the only ones still talking are echoing this point or just want to have a go at Taylor. He gave us all the chance to vote on it and it was then out of the guy&#8217;s hands. The students have decided and that is the end of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brywn Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48185</link>
		<author>brywn Webster</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nouse.co.uk/2008/02/07/hackwood-voted-out-by-8-votes/#comment-48185</guid>
		<description>i think the real question here is....
Was W.G. Grace the greatest Cricketer of all time and would he cope in the modern game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the real question here is&#8230;.<br />
Was W.G. Grace the greatest Cricketer of all time and would he cope in the modern game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
