YUSU accused of sexism

Bailey and Burton

YUSU has been accused of sexism by national groups, academic and administrative staff and students during a controversy regarding the gender-specific “goodie bags” that were distributed at Freshers’ Fair.

The bags, which were sourced from Complimen-tary Sampling by Sam Bayley, Societies and Communications Officer, and Matt Burton, Services and Finance Officer, were colour coded blue and pink and read ‘Welcome from your Students’ Union’. The blue bags contained a sample copy of FHM (For Him Magazine), a chocolate bar and a full-size tin of baked beans. The pink bags contained cellulite cream, female deoderant, and a half-size tin of baked beans. YUSU have claimed that the bags had no gender connotations.

YUSU has received over 40 letters and emails of complaint about the bags. In an email leaked to Nouse, the director of OBJECT, which acts as an advisor to Amnesty International UK, works with NUS and is a member of the Women’s National Commission, criticised YUSU’s actions. Dr Sasha Rakoff said: “We feel YUSU’s decision to promote pornographic and deeply contemptuous material to male students reflects very poorly on the University, is totally counter to any equality commitments and plays its part in contributing to an environment where women - who can be as young as 17 - are, and feel, less safe and welcome than they have every right to expect.”

Members of University staff have also spoken out against the bags. In an email to Nouse, the University’s Equal Opportunities Officer, Yvie Holder, said, “the contents of the bags will have been inappropriate on cultural, religious and gender grounds and quite possibly offensive to some groups in the University community. We want the first impression of the University to be a welcoming one, not something that makes some students feel uneasy or offends them.”

In an email to Amy Burge, former Women’s Officer, Meghan Reid from the Centre for Women’s Studies said: “This is absolutely ridiculous. This action seriously undermines the work the University and YUSU do to maintain a high reputation and support our students regardless of gender or sexual identity”.

The initial proposal by Bayley and Burton to distribute the bags was met with vocal opposition from several officers of the Students’ Union. The matter was taken to the weekly Union Executive meeting, on which all Union officers sit. Following a heated debate, the motion passed narrowly by seven votes to five, with no abstentions.

Speaking during the meeting, Laura Payne, a YUSU Women’s Officer said: “In our opinion, some of the items in the bags, such as the copy of FHM and the cellulite cream, are designed to enforce gender stereotypes; they could potentially be detrimental to students’ welfare and the culture of equality we have here at the University.”

Matt Burton and Sam Bayley upheld that there was no problem with the bags. Burton said: “Why do we need to baby people? It’s political correctness gone mad. There are a lot of people that would get a lot of pleasure out of these magazines.” FHM has recently been reprimanded for publishing topless photos of a 14-year-old girl without her consent.

The opposition by the Women’s Officers was strongly supported by Academic and Welfare Officer, Grace Fletcher-Hall and ex-Women’s Officer, Amy Burge who also sat in on discussions at the open meeting on October 10. Burge spoke out against the bags, saying “they are not only sexist to women; they also assume that all male students are interested in viewing sexually explicit photographs of women, and completely ignore gay men.”

Matthew Pallas, LGBT Officer said he found FHM to be “degrading to women” and thought the bags were “heteronormative, subconsciously sending out the message that everyone is straight.”

Leaked emails obtained by Nouse have shown continued disquiet within YUSU since the motion was passed. Sam Bayley sent out emails reminding all officers “that they are required by the Union Code (and thus the constitution) to abide by and carry out decisions of the Executive Committee, and that officers must not campaign against the decisions of a committee once they have been voted upon.”

To counter the distribution of bags at YUSU Fair, Amy Burge gave students the opportunity to swap their copies of FHM and cellulite cream for “sexism free” cakes. About 250 copies of FHM were swapped. During the fair, freshers showed mixed reactions to the bags. One female student said: “What I find really offensive is the implication that women eat less than men. I don’t know many women who aren’t capable of eating a full tin of beans and a chocolate bar, yet those items weren’t included in our bags.” One male student said of the controversy “some people need to be shipped off to the Third World. Then they’d have something worth complaining about.”

Pallas will put forward a motion regarding the bags at a Union General Meeting on Tuesday October 23. The motion, which has been seconded by Environment and Ethics Officers, the Academic and Welfare Officer, and the Women’s Officers, states that “any Union sabbatical, part-time officer or staff member who orders or receives products…to be distributed free to students during Freshers’ Week or at any other freshers’ welcome event must consult the Academic & Welfare Officer, Equality & Diversity Officers and Environment & Ethics Officers” to make sure that any products detrimental to the welfare of students will not be distributed.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

10 Responses





  1. Dave

    October 26th, 2007 at 11:23 am

    I can’t belive this is even a problem. Is it not true that men read men’s magazines and women care more about cellulite? I bet all of the complaints are from female students studying English and History who needed something better to do with their first few weeks of uni, having 2 hours of lectures and all.

  2. Amy

    October 27th, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    Dave,

    If you’ll refer to the article, you will observe that YUSU have received complaints from Dr Sasha Rakoff, the director of OBJECT, which acts as an advisor to Amnesty International UK; Yvie Holder, the head of the University’s Equal Opportunities Office; the current Women’s Officers, LGBT Officer and Environment and Ethics Officers and yes, various students, both undergraduate and post-graduate.

    Why student’s views should be considered inferior is beyond me…

  3. Dario Fo

    October 28th, 2007 at 1:50 am

    Look at that photo. Can you get any more shifty? Raving spit-flecked chauvinists, make no mistake.

  4. Dorothy Nyamnyam

    October 29th, 2007 at 12:07 am

    If I handed out my fresh turds in a brown paper bag to everyone there’d be less of a fuss.

  5. Mark

    October 29th, 2007 at 2:38 am

    Manchester Met also gave away FHM in there male goodie bags.

  6. Adam

    October 30th, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    I think this whole thing is blown way out of proportion…

    If you didn’t want to take a bag on moral/ethical or other grounds you weren’t forced to and i’m sure you could have just given it back after you had taken one.

    Being gay I am a little more sensitive to discrimination I guess, but I agree with Dave.

    It seems more a case of students being political for the sake of it.

  7. Ric

    October 31st, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    Excellent article, well done Nouse.

    This would p*ss me off happening on the street where we can’t control corporate power of crappy stereotypes. This should certainly NOT be sponsored by union officers, who are supposed to be seen as an approachable group of representatives. It’s not the Unions job to provide free tintilation and the risk of offending people far outweighs the “pleasure [people might get] out of these magazines”.

    YUSU’s ability to claimed that the bags had no gender connotations is hilarious. Do Matt Burton and his Sidekick-Sam live in a world with no gender stereotypes? Last time I looked, barbies were pink, shampoo adverts were aimed at women and FHM was called For *Him* Magazine.

    Ric Lander, Angry Alumni

  8. Rinky Stingpiece

    October 31st, 2007 at 4:53 pm

    So no “fag bags” either?

    Gutted.

  9. Lyn Haskell

    November 4th, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    I am assuming that these bags were an optional thing to take. That way, if people were offended by them, surely it would be easier just to boycott them? I can understand this sort of outrage if they were forced upon people. Maybe it’s immoral to distribute FHM or cellulite cream, but surely you could just ask for it to be taken out of the bag?
    This is PC taken a bit too far.

  10. Jon H

    November 8th, 2007 at 11:04 am

    Oh for crying out loud. The 40 people who complained are probably the 40 feminists on campus. My housemates found the bags hilarious. When will people get a grip and start worrying out something important? Things like this just enforce the hypersensitive, humourless, politically corect moronic stereotype that Universities carry nowadays. And we wonder why.

Jump up to the comment form >