University reveals smoking policy

College provosts and Heads of Departments have been given the “legal responsibility” of policing the smoking ban by the University, despite receiving no specific guidelines on how to deal with those that break the law and being warned that if they fail to do so adequately, they will be “exposed to possible legal proceedings”.

The policy, released last week, prohibits smoking in all University premises and will come into practice on July 1, the same day that smoking in smoke-free areas is made illegal across England.

The ‘Procedure’ section of the policy states: “The responsibility for implementing this Policy will lie with Heads of Departments and College Provosts.” However, there is no specific advice for how to deal with those that are caught smoking inside.

Commercial Services has also received no instruction from the University for how bar staff is college bars are to proceed when someone is found breaking the ban.

A spokesman for the University confirmed that no specific guidelines would be given to Heads of Departments and College Provosts, saying, “Guidance and advice is available from the Pro Vice-Chancellor for Students and Health and Safety, if required.

“If smoking is taking place in a public area, the senior member of staff has a legal responsibility to deal with it effectively. That does not necessarily mean that the police will be automatically involved, for instance if someone inadvertently lights up and extinguishes the cigarette immediately when warned.”

The policy states: “If members of the community or their guests do not observe the policy then Heads of Departments, College Provosts and the University of York may be exposed to possible legal proceedings.”

Smoking will be permitted in the University grounds, but no one will be able to smoke from windows, on roofs or in doorways. Smoking is also not permitted within two metres of any University building.

YUSU President Rich Croker, who sat on the working group that helped formulate the policy, welcomed the measures. He said, “It ensures the University conform to the national requirements whilst ensuring a clear message is presented to staff and students alike. Considerations were taken in regards to some aspects such as making the campus a smoke-free zone or to build extensions to allow people to smoke near bars, but they were rejected for legitimate reasons which we supported.”

In 2004, Leeds University Union brought in a four-week trial smoking ban in its bars, which was abandoned after sales dropped by over £26,000 in 13 days. Despite this, John Greenwood, head of Commercial Services (which manages the bars), has welcomed the ban as beneficiary for the health of his staff.

He said he will “wait and see” as to whether it will affect their profitability, but added that the recent examples of a smoking ban in Scotland, Ireland and New York had not given him any great cause for worry.

Licensed premises in York have begun to bring in measures for the smoking ban amidst worries the nightlife trade in the city may drop. To hide unsavoury smells such as stale beer and sweat that the smoke had previously covered, Nexus and BPM are set to use industrial air fresheners to pump smells such as strawberry and lemon meringue pie through the bar areas. Toffs is also set to start work on a smoking area, although no concrete details have yet been released.

One comment

  1. 26 Nov ’07 at 11:26 pm

    Aamer Sarfraz

    Anti-Smoking Policy/law works as we found significant support for it in our recently publsihed work in Kent Journal of Mental Health.

    Higher prevalence of smoking among mental health patients and staff is a major concern and a possible target for health promotion. A survey of attitudes to smoking and smoking cessation was carried out among patients and staff in our catchment area in view of the NHS smoke-free initiative in the U.K.. We found that a majority (70%) of participants were aware of this initiative and 60% of smokers wanted to quit. Aids for quitting smoking were also viewed positively and combined methods and nicotine replacement were seen as most helpful. Our findings suggest that introduction of a smoke free policy is an excellent opportunity to promote smoking cessation among mental health patients and staff.

    Reply Report

Leave a comment

Please note our disclaimer relating to comments submitted. Please do not post pretending to be another person. Nouse is not responsible for user-submitted content.